2. The Case of Free and Open-Source Software (27/02)
Section outline
-
Question: How to compensate for coders’ work on publicly available projects?
Recommended material: A Ford Foundation report by Eghbal and this paper by Pazaitis and Kostakis.
Highlights:
- Free and open-source software makes software production: faster; more inclusive and passionate; cheaper; and more innovative.
- Free and open-source software projects are underfunded because of free riding; lack of awareness; and anti-money culture.
- Key distinction: Consumer software vs. infrastructure software.
- How to support or fund free and open-source software (FOSS) production (no solution is perfect):
- Public procurement
- Release publicly funded code as open-source ("public money, public code")
- Hire key developers
- Tax-exempt for open-source organizations
- Create a tax/fee for for-profit companies that use FOSS
- Promote FOSS through education (teachers, students, see Google’s Summer of Code)
- Create public awareness and institutionalise appreciation
- Experiment with new commons-oriented licenses to ensure that for-profit companies reciprocate (dual licensing)
- Tokenization
- Public procurement